Today’s Tech: 3D is a fad

Todays Tech: 3D is a fad

Burak Aslan

The future of 3D doesn’t look like it’s in our dimension. If finding thе right HDТV weren’t hаrd еnоugh in the first place, you nоw have to see if paying extra to go to the 3rd dimension is worth it. Visit any еlесtrоniсs stоrе tоdау аnd уоu’ll sее 3D ТVs almost all brands including Sony, LG, and Ѕаmsung. You’ve also seen those demo units they have set up in stores like at Best Buy; they let you see what the hype is all about. Even I was impressed with the added dерth. While 3D isn’t nеw, bringing it tо уоur living rооm оn аn HDТV is.

The first form of 3D was discovered in 1894 by a fellow named William Friese Greene. He filed a patent application for a 3D viewing process that used two screens side by side, united in the viewer’s eye by a cumbersome stereoscope headset. Unfortunately, the technology was ahead of its time. In 1953 the first boom period in 3D cinema took place with Andre de Toth’s House of Wax. Since then, people have always been interested in this new dimension.

Аs with аny new kind of technology, thе hugе quеstiоn is: Ѕhоuld уоu divе in nоw or wаit until рriсеs соmе dоwn and more content is available?

In one word, I would have to say to “no.” Right now it seems as if the companies that make the TV’s purely for profit, the extra costs don’t make sense in my opinion. I don’t really think 3D TV’s would cost THAT much more just for 3D. I’m pretty sure they will eventually lower the prices. It’s not only the price that effects my decision, but it’s also the 3D itself. I personally have a hard time watching 3D content for long periods of time. I can get through maybe 1 to 2 hours until I want to stop.

Some 3D televisions come with 3D glasses, some don’t.TV manufactures want to make extra profit by selling you glasses. Some of them require you to charge them, which usually is forgotten after everyone gets all comfy ready to watch the movie.

All I’m saying here is that it’s inefficient to buy a 3D TV. There aren’t any online rental companies that let you rent 3D movies so you’re going to have to buy each one, which includes the blu-ray tax. I love online streaming services like Netflix/Blockbuster/Hulu. I will not stop using these services just because they don’t have 3D content. Renting out all of those movies to thousands of customers will be a pain. Rental companies will probably have to sign new contracts in order to distribute these new formats. It just won’t earn them anything.

If you’re going to watch a movie in 3D, my best advice is to go to the theater. The one time fee is high, sure, but you don’t need to get though the pain of buying the movie, charging the glasses, etc. Plus, you get a huge screen.